Thursday, September 23, 2010

Paydays less beneficial with flat consumer rates

Data was shown that claims the consumer price index has been almost the very same for too long. There are numerous months that prices have been flat on all goods and services. Most people are good when it comes to buying the normal food. No instant loans is needed for them. For a long time, the price index has been at about zero for the part and parcel for a federal rate of interest. An interest rate that holds steady at a low threshold is practically the Fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse, as it typically signals deflation.

Low customer prices to determine everywhere

The Consumer Price Index is how the Department of Commerce tracks the rise and fall of prices of goods and services. For August, the CPI rose by .3 percent, after a .3 rise in July, as outlined by the new York Times. Many thought there were only a couple reasons the number would rise. Numerous thought it was energy and food prices rising. Those two good are all that have changed. Anything else in consumer prices has stayed put. Cost of goods and services is tied to demand, and with unemployment up to it is, hardly everyone is willing to spend much. Retailers aren’t benefiting. They’re getting fewer customers and much less payday cash.

Interest rates too low

Along with consumer prices staying low, federal rates of interest are at near zero for months. When banks borrow or lend to other banks, the interest rate the Federal Reserve set is what banks have to use. Usually these loans are used for loan credit. More are borrowing with such low rates of interest. There is one thing to consider. The economy will not get any better with banks who do not want to lend. Since hardly any money is being used, money begins losing a lot of value. That is called deflation.

Low federal rates hurting even more

If deflation sets in, value of goods will go down, but prices will go up in order to keep suppliers in business. However, that will not be accompanied by a rise in wages.

Further reading

NY Times

nytimes.com/2010/09/18/business/economy/18econ.html?src=busln



No comments: